The private sector could play a more prominent role in investments in the water sector, Water and Environmental Affairs policy acting deputy director general Mbangiseni Nepfumbada said on Tuesday.

Speaking at a Water Investment World conference, Nepfumbada also said that South Africa had to improve the quality of its water supply and reduce unlawful use and water loss.

He stated that not enough was being done to highlight the importance of water, which should be seen as a catalyst for development.

International Finance Corporation (IFC) water and sanitation specialist Patrick Mullen said that the gap between water supply and demand would increase by 40% in the next 20 years.

“Only private finance would close the gap with an investment of about $50-billion a year, as well as treating water, like oil, as a commercial resource,” said Mullen.

He cited political risks, returns in term of tariffs, which limits bankable deals and the regulatory environment as impeding investments in the water sector.

Mullen stated that the IFC had observed an increase in private sector investment in emerging markets.

“We have identified opportunities in Africa as a focus area and at the moment, water has been a profitable sector in the corporation and investments have yielded 35% returns,” he said.

By: Dennis Ndaba -Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter

Robinson_Lake_1_1138750b

For years Neels Van Wyk suspected something was wrong with the water on his farm, worries that grew as mining and government officials started frequenting the area to test nearby rivers.


Photograph by: Ashley Kemp

Van Wyk, 48, lives in Westonaria on the southwestern outskirts of Johannesburg, surrounded by four major mines which over the last 120 years extracted gold and uranium.

Most of the mines closed down 11 years ago, when pumping of underground water reserves also stopped.

Now researchers worry that toxic mine water is rising toward the surface and seeping into nearby water supplies, contaminating rivers with a cocktail of acidic and sometimes radioactive waste.

“My concern is that I use borehole water which could be contaminated. I sell peaches and vegetables to the hawkers and they sell it to the community. What if the vegetables are contaminated and we don’t know that,” Van Wyk said.

Activists fear rising water levels in the mines have created an underground time bomb that could threaten the country’s nearby financial capital Johannesburg in 16 months.

The threats are massive: groundwater contamination, health risks like cancers, poisoned soils, and fears for the city’s buildings.

“The matter has to be addressed with great urgency,” said Mariette Liefferink who heads the Federation for a Sustainable Environment.

“Acid mine drainage is as corrosive as swimming pool acid but it also contains a cocktail of radioactive and toxic heavy metal.”

Toxic waters are now lurking just about half a kilometre in mined chambers below surface but rising by 30 centimetres (one foot) a day, even before the seasonal rains get underway which could increase the rate threefold.

The government says the heavy metal-laced swill could hit enter the last safety buffer, an area stretching 150 metres below surface, by early 2012.

But it believes South Africans should not be panicking yet, with former finance minister Trevor Manuel dismissing fears that Johannesburg residents would be sloshing around the streets in gumboots as ridiculous.

“It’s urgent but it’s not a crisis,” said Marius Keet, a senior regional water affairs official.

“But we’re not supposed to reach that stage – we have to do something before that.”

The state says it has a year to find a solution. A new ministerial committee produced a report in October, but has not released the findings.

In July, the water affairs department warned of catastrophic results if Johannesburg’s groundwater was contaminated or mines began decanting below the city centre.

“We will not allow that – it’s definitely not going to happen. It will not decant in the city of Johannesburg,” Keet told AFP.

Toxic mine water surfaced eight years ago just west of Johannesburg, and still flows out of the ground during heavy rains.

“The underground mining basin is now flooding and has flooded with acid mine drainage to a point that it now spills out on to the surface,” said Liefferink.

The run-off has poisoned soil, made a dam radioactive and wiped out life in affected waters, she said.

South Africa has 6,000 abandoned and derelict mines — many run by firms now out of business, leaving the state responsible for 70 percent of them.

But government lacks the 1.5 billion rands (217.6 million dollars, 156 million euros) needed for a 10-year rehabilitation plan.

Just one pump to remove the water costs 218 million rands, but the current budget for this is 14 million.

“Where the basins are flooding, there are no management plans in place. Where it has flooded in the western basin, it’s now just crisis management,” said Liefferink.

“What is lacking here is the political will and commitment to implement these plans and also to apportion liability.”

water-time-bomb

By Tony Carnie

Trade unions are turning up pressure on the government to tackle the country’s dirty water “time bomb” as a matter of urgency – or face the prospect of national protest action.

The Federation of Unions of SA (Fedusa), the second-largest trade union group in the country, warned yesterday that the government was neglecting the management of clean water, including scores of overflowing sewage treatment works that should be placed in “intensive care”.

Fedusa said it would prefer to see the problems resolved in the interests of the public rather than embarking on protest action, but it had nevertheless served a warning notice on the government last month in terms of section 77 of the Labour Relations Act.

This allows worker groups to embark on protected strike/protest action to promote or defend socio-economic interests if grievances cannot be resolved by the National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac).

In a memorandum to the government, Fedusa said it was no longer a secret that South Africa’s water security was under threat.

“The media inundate us every day with news reports, pictures and film footage of raw sewage and industrial effluent being pumped blatantly into dams, streams and rivers, thus polluting one of our most precious natural resources to the extent that it poses a dreadful danger to all forms of life.

“Hardly a day goes by without reports of water purification and sanitation plants that have fallen into a state of disrepair, because local authorities no longer have knowledgeable people with the necessary expertise to maintain the plants.

“The result is unsafe water running from taps (particularly in rural areas) and disgusting sewage bubbling up from manholes in the streets of many towns.”

Despite the apparent culture of “total disrespect” towards water, this was not the time to play the blame game, but rather to work together to solve it.

“The fact is that 98 percent of South Africa’s available water supply is already fully utilised and the country is sitting on a time bomb which will affect each and every person within her borders. Enough has been said to confirm that we are dealing with a problem of gigantic proportions.”

Problems such as inadequate staffing, funding and expertise had been identified by the Water Affairs Department five years ago, while the department’s latest Blue Drop drinking water report showed that only 55 percent of municipalities managed to score higher than 50 percent.

The companion Green Drop report on waste water treatment suggested that 76 percent of municipal sewage works scored below 50 percent, while many had in effect scored zero.

The Fedusa report said 19 major dams across the country were highly polluted, scores of wild animals had died in the Kruger National Park from drinking polluted water and some farmers were unable to irrigate crops because river water was polluted.

To add to the problems, the Water Affairs Ministry was on record as stating that R100 billion was needed over the next three years to restore water infrastructure, but the available budget was only R26.8bn.

However, Nedlac has to try four times to resolve the grievances before protected protest action can begin. The first meeting was held yesterday in Joburg.

Leon Grobler, CEO of Fedusa affiliate the United Association of SA, said: “All our members need to drink water to survive and we see it as part of our duty to society to get involved and to ensure that the potential health impacts of drinking polluted water are avoided.”

He said the government had agreed to form a joint steering committee of Fedusa and government representatives, but had also requested a 30-day recess to consult government ministers and officials.

Fedusa also raised concern about the problem of acid-polluted mine water in Gauteng as well as chemical pollution from mines in Witbank and other parts of Mpumalanga.

Fedusa said the World Health Organisation calculated that about 3.4 million Africans died every year from drinking unsafe water or because of poor sanitation.

University of Stellenbosch health sciences epidemiologist Jo Barnes warned of the deadly health hazards of polluted streams, rivers and dams and said more emphasis should be placed on tracing pollution to its source.

“We need a commitment from all South Africans to seriously and visibly act fast to address the issues that are now threatening the lives of the poor,” she said.

Fedusa demanded that the Water Affairs Department identify dysfunctional water and wastewater treatment plants and place them in “intensive care” under a national project manager who should draw up a programme and prepare a budget to restore the water infrastructure.

The Water Institute of SA should also be approached to explore the possibility of fast-tracking the training of water treatment staff.

“The handover of ‘restored’ plants to the respective municipalities should be conditional on the correct staff being appointed and trained.”

The Water Affairs Department could not be reached for comment. – The Mercury

oil

Russia is considering becoming the world’s top supplier of fresh water as growing demand turns it into a strategic resource. That is if it can upgrade its own consumption to modern standards.
If you pay attention to the perils that future may bring, you probably know that the oil will run dry, the sea level will rise and drown coastal regions, and that fresh water will be such a valuable asset that even the oil price will seem low in comparison. All this provided that the world will not end in 2012 in accordance with Mayan prophecies, of course.

The future global water crisis is indeed a gloomy thing: by 2030 half of world’s population will face a fresh water deficit, according to the UN’s World Water Assessment Program forecast. Thirsty nations will take up arms against their saturated neighbors. People drinking polluted water will become ill. Ecologies will die out when the rivers feeding them are depleted for the sake of human farms and factories.

Read more

Russia has world’s second-largest water reserves after Brazil (it’s hard to compete with the Amazon River, but having in your territory the world’s largest lake, Baikal, which contains 20 per cent of the world’s fresh surface water, really helps).

Could it be that in 20 years the country, in addition to being a reliable supplier of hydrocarbons (or holding EU in energy grip, if you prefer this point of view), will also be a top supplier of stuff to drink?
The problem does exist, but…

Global demand for fresh water is growing steadily. Not only is humanity itself becoming more numerous, it also consumes more water per capita than it used to. The latter happens indirectly as developing countries become hungrier for things requiring much water to produce – paper, synthetic fibers, even home appliances and cars, but first of all foods.

Agriculture is the single biggest consumer of water, accounting for some 70 per cent of the total volume we expend. And among different food products demand different volumes of water to produce. One kilo of beef “drinks” an estimated 15,000 liters, compared to 1,000 liters needed for one kilo of wheat. The new armies of cows and pigs grown to replace rice on the plates of Chinese workers make this hidden strain on rivers and groundwater.

Conflicts over water are evident, especially in regions where the resource is scarce. Water consumption is one of the stumbling blocks in the conflict between Israel and Palestine, as well as a constant source of tension between the Jewish state, Lebanon and Jordan. Turkey is in a quarrel with Syria and Iraq over the use of water from the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers. Other hotspots include Central Asia and Northern Africa.

Health problems which poor water quality can cause are also hard to deny, with an estimated 80 per cent of diseases in the world linked to it in some way. For instance, world’s largest mass arsenic poisoning – which is believed to have affected up to 77 million people in Bangladesh over 40 years and account for some 20 per cent of deaths in the country – was caused by contaminated water. Ironically, the source is the numerous wells drilled with help from international organizations to provide water cleanse it of pathogens.

However, a 2006 UN report on global water deficit points out that much of the problems stir not from the physical absence of freshwater, but rather from poor governance and lack of investment into things like sewage treatment and efficient use of water. Despite arid climate, wealthy Persian Gulf countries can afford desalination and extraction of fossil water, which, combined with good consumption practices, allows providing its population. Of course, it is of little consolation for the poor folk, but leaves room for optimism nevertheless.
Water superpower – not just yet

The goal of the future is to deliver the existing water from places of abundance to those in need. But if you are picturing great pipelines running from Siberian rivers to Spain and tanker fleets carrying Baikal water to the sheikhs, you are a little bit unrealistic. It is not economically viable.

Water is much cheaper than oil or gas, which means the cost of its transportation puts a greater barrier on trade, and annual volumes consumed are much greater. For instance, Russia’s domestic water consumption is 180 times higher than that of domestic oil consumption.

The solution could be great channels, which would bring water to buyers in a natural flow, but those require extremely high capital investment. Even China, famous for cyclopean infrastructure projects, is hesitant to pay for its South–North Water Transfer Project, the system of channels which would supply the water-hungry north of the country with water from the south. Putting such investment for the sake of foreign buyers rather then your own economy would be optimistic and short-sighted at best.

Also, unlike with energy, alternative sources of fresh water are there to be used. Sea water desalination has being improving over the decades, and the most cost-efficient facilities produce water at around $0.5 per cubic meter today. There is also iceberg towage, which is done on a limited scale in Canada now, but has the potential to become a regular enterprise in a thirstier world. Optimistic estimates promise iceberg water at $0.8 per cubic meter.

A more realistic approach would be the development of domestic industries, which require much water, like agriculture or production of nuclear power, and exporting the products instead.

Finally Russia, with all its water riches, has problems providing its own population, and the fact that most of the people live in the European part of the country while water is more abundant in the east is just a small part of the problem. According to government estimates voiced at the international forum Pure Water 2010 in Moscow, less then 40 per cent of Russians drink safe water. Some 25 per cent of the people have no centralized water supply at all.

Water usage in Russia suffers from poor efficiency, which is two to three times below that in Europe. To change the situation, large-scale investment into water saving technology and public campaigning are needed. A government-sponsored modernization program currently on the table is expected to be launched next year. Prime Minister Putin said its budget will be $300 million over the first three years. The sum “is not grand, yet noticeable” he admitted.

Alexandre Antonov, RT

acid mine drainage
acid mine drainage

Acid mine drainage

The team of experts compiling a report on the acid mine drainage (AMD) situation in the Witwatersrand has completed the report, and on Thursday presented it to the Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC).
The Ministers discussed the findings with the experts, and asked the team to identify more options to resolve the AMD problem, as well as the cost implications of each.

The IMC and the team of experts would then meet again to decide on the way forward, based on recommendations from the new report.
The report was not made public.
Water Affairs Minister Buyelwa Sonjica, Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu, National Planning Commission Minister Trevor Manuel, Science and Technology Minister Naledi Pandor and Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan serve on the IMC which was formed to investigate the issue.
The panel of experts tasked with compiling the report to assess the risk, was made up of individuals from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, the Water Research Council, the Council for Geoscience, the Chamber of Mines, as well as the Department of Water and Environmental Affairs and the Department of Mineral Resources.
AMD has been described as one of the most significant environmental threats facing South Africa, which was already a water scarce country. Significant funds would be required to treat the problem, which was the legacy of 120 years of gold mining in the Witwatersrand

Water droplet
All low fruit of water has been harvested and exhausted.  There is not a single river that can possibly be damned in the country to augment supply.  There are no more augmentation schemes like we know to provide any more water.  Simply put 2010 sees South Africa on its last dregs of supply management as we know it.  The future is not rosy.
The future:
Worst hit will be the Reef.  Ground water will soon be polluted with Acid Mine Water which will enter the water table and erode buildings.  Rivers are being polluted with sewerage AMW, and it is not just the acid water that is so toxic to the rivers, but Cyanide, and radioactive substances including isotopes of Radon, Iridium and  Uranium.  The cocktail of these will make it impossible to use this water for anything whatsoever.  Worse still, is that this water will reach the drinking water of the Vaal system and make this water unusable too, soon, within 18 months!
There is not one single sewerage treatment works in the whole country that is able to process all of the sewerage effluent arriving in the pipelines to their works.  This means that raw, untreated effluent is flowing into every river around the country, and all over the country people are dying from drinking toxic water, in a septic state for us to drink!
Water outages have become the norm in many municipalities unable to cope with increasing demand.  Outages will come to Gauteng by 2013 and Cape Town perhaps sooner.
Cape Town is going into a drought cycle, from which they will only emerge in 3 years time, and will be out of water by 2012.  Though the city is way ahead in educational exposure of water matters, the city ignores rainwater harvesting and the water saving aspect of demand management as a tool to provide extra water for the City.
Places like Hartebeest Poort: this is simply an extension of a sewerage treatment works.  The water is toxic and even the municipality drawing on this water admit that they are unable to treat this water for potable purposes.
Worse is to follow.
The AMW has reached this body of water.  Rand Water is contracting to provide the diminishing water from the Vaal Dam at a staggering 200 million Rand to the area for drinking quality water.
The good news:
Enter Water Rhapsody from the wings:
Water Rhapsody will reduce demand for most if not all buildings by at least 50% and in some instances by 90%.  Water Rhapsody too will provide water safe to use in the house by harvesting water from roofs, and pumping under normal pressure to the whole household.  Furthermore Water Rhapsody with its proven conservation systems is able to reduce water demand to as low as 80 litres per person per day.  Country wide the current demand is 240 litres per person per day.  Water Rhapsody does this without getting the user to change his or her lifestyle in any way.  The resultant effluent from a user of the Water Rhapsody Systems of Conservation is a fall in sewerage flow of 90%.  This reduction over a whole suburb would mean that any sewerage treatment works would be able to cope with the effluent volume, allowing water safe to drink running into our rivers.
Clearly Municipalities as well as Government must take notice that we have a disaster that is currently happening.  It is not if, or when this might happen, IT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW!!!
The track record and technology for the Water Rhapsody Systems is proven without a single failure ever.  The systems have been built into the biggest companies and institutions including Old Mutual in Pinelands and UCT in Cape Town.
The Government and municipalities treat water as a commodity because they sell water for profit but we must never lose sight of the fact that water is a precious resource.
Lastly, though coastal regions are in a better position that inland cities, none of these cities have enough water.  The buzz words of using ground water and desalination of sea water are not sustainable.  The water for instance in the TMG (Table Mountain Group) aquifer is fossil water from millions of years ago, and be warned – there is a finite amount of water in the aquifer, and the recharge is perhaps thousands of years.  As for desalination of sea water – the energy cost of 4 kilowatt hours to desalinate sea water to make one kilolitre of potable water is simply not a cost effective way of providing water.  Take the smallest of the large dams supplying Cape Town –Steenbras Lower Dam contains 30 million kilolitres  of water which Cape Town would use up in less than 15 days.  It would cost Cape Town 120 million Kilowatt hours of power generation to provide the equivalent amount of water as this dam though the desalination process of Reverse Osmosis (RO).  Clearly this should not be considered as an option.  Cape Town is stressed enough for power supply, and there would not be enough power generation for this option.
Water Rhapsody encourages the  public to make use of their natural resources, not taking away of using more energy to try to create something out of existing resources. People must realize the effect of what we’re implementing now, on our future and those of the one’s we leave behind.
Source – www.watersafe.co.za

water image

Farmers warned yesterday that SA’s deteriorating water quality could put European export markets at risk.

The warning throws a harsh light on the state of SA’s water quality and the African National Congress’s policy of cadre deployment at local government level.

A 2009 Green Drop report found 55% of SA’s 900 water treatment plants attained a score of less than 50%.

The farmers’ warning also echoes the concerns of retailers Pick n Pay and Spar, who said yesterday they are concerned about declining water quality. Woolworths dismissed a widely reported supplier’s claim that it has rejected produce contaminated with Escheria coli, a pathogen found in sewage.

Woolworths later said that while no product has been rejected due to concerns about E. coli, its suppliers are mindful of the need to preserve water quality.

Individual farmers were reluctant to talk to Business Day for fear of jeopardising existing contracts with local and foreign buyers, but the Transvaal Agricultural Union (TAU) said its members are worried that if they continue using contaminated water, their produce would fail to meet stringent European standards.

“If the standards fall (below) a certain level, Europe won’t accept our food. If we let everyone know, and we lose our export markets, (farmers) stand to lose millions, and there will be job losses,” TAU vice-president Louis Meintjes said.

If farmers lose foreign customers, they will be forced to dump their produce on the local market, with knock-on effects for other farmers who depend on domestic customers. Mr Meintjes emphasised that water is contaminated not only with pathogens originating from untreated sewage, but also with industrial pollutants and agricultural run-off.

“It’s been a problem for a long time, but over the past two or three years it’s got much worse.”

Farmers were particularly worried about waterborne pathogens such as E. coli, he said.

These accumulate on the surface of fruit and vegetables irrigated with contaminated water and can survive there for weeks after harvest. The concentration of bacteria rises with each successive watering.

While it is possible for farmers to treat contaminated produce after harvest to kill the pathogens – with radiation, for example – it is prohibitively expensive.

Pick n Pay spokeswoman Tamra Veley said the company tested farmers’ produce monthly, and those who had E. coli in their irrigation water had to buy their own water treatment plants.

Pick n Pay last detected E. coli last year, but the issue is a growing problem, she said.

Spar’s Freshline head Peter Gohl said it last had an E. coli incident 18 months ago. Contrary to other stakeholders interviewed, its testing had found no evidence of a worsening situation.

Mr Meintjes said the TAU is frustrated by the government’s failure to enforce the Water Act and laid criminal charges against the state in May, but the police have made no progress.

Declining water quality has also seen the Save the Vaal campaign turn to the courts, chairman Lötter Wepener said. Last month it secured a court order compelling the Parys municipality to maintain its sewage works. Tour operators running water sports downstream of Parys had complained of a bad smell and solid sewage waste in the water, said his colleague, Annalien Burger. “Can you imagine if you have tourists in canoes and this (stuff) is in the water?” she said.

Jo Barnes, an epidemiologist from the University of Stellenbosch who has done research on pathogens in river water, said the risk of sewage pollution is climbing “across the country”.

Dr Barnes, who says she has been threatened by farmers and officials who do not want her to blow the whistle on the state of SA’s rivers, said she is “really concerned” about the government’s denial of the problem.

“There is no follow-up (on polluting municipalities) and no comebacks,” she said.

Trade union Uasa said the poor state of water treatment works “could potentially mean that 4174 megalitres of untreated or partially treated waste water, which is the equivalent of 1670 Olympic-size swimming pools, could be ending up in our our dams and rivers on a daily basis”.

Source – Allafrica.com

Water-pollution

Water is as a commodity, that is becoming the fastest growing awareness driven product on the planet. We drink it every day, yet we know so little about the effects it has on our body.

South Africa is not the only country to have abused this natural resource. Water pollution is creating all kinds of new challenges in every sector of the market. It is said that the Eskom load shedding scare will pale in comparison to the eminent water crisis looming just years from now.

Is this scare real?

MNET’s Carte Blanche has recently (and repeatedly) done investigative journalism surrounding the water crisis in South Africa. They show proof thereof and interview experts who testify that the water is deteriorating rapidly. They show lakes, rivers and dams that are so contaminated that we feel sick just watching these documentaries. They also illustrate how many municipalities are not up to scratch when it comes to the cleansing systems and delivery of recycled water.
So is the scare real? Well, just think about this scenario. The population worldwide has grown from one billion people a hundred years ago to a staggering 6.5 billion people now with estimates of over 9 billion in just 15 years time. This means an additional 8 billion people, drinking it, washing with it and wasting it globally.

We wash our cars with it, fill our swimming pools, water our gardens, flush our toilets, bath and shower with it with little or no thought as to where it comes from or where it’s going.

Industries are using it with no respect and dump dirty contaminated water into rivers and lakes which damage the eco-system so badly in some cases that it is not possible to clean it up anymore.

Infrastructures are struggling to clean it up as fast as it’s being contaminated. Just picture the amount of filth that must be taken out of the water we use. The water is then just recycled over and over again.

Why do we need water?

Our body needs water for two basic functions, hydrating our system to keep its ambient temperature the same and to flush toxins that may harm our system. Our body consists of 72% water, held together in an intricate cellular system that constantly uses the water within itself. This water does not stay in one place, but rather moves around to accommodate growth and function.
So if 72% of our body consists of water, does it not make good sense to put clean, healthy and pure water into it?
Drinking the right kind of water is one of your best natural protections against all kinds of viral infections such as influenza, pneumonia, whooping cough, measles and other infectious diseases. When the body’s cells are kept well supplied with ample ‘good quality’ water, they can fight viral attacks more efficiently.

Water is a vital component of all bodily fluids, tissues, cells, lymph, blood and glandular secretions. Water holds all nutritive factors in solution and acts as a transportation medium to the various parts of the body for these substances.

Liquid is necessary for the proper digestion of food! The Stomach acts as a powerful churn to break down food into tiny particles.

With all the billions of litres of fresh, sweet water there is on earth, only a fraction of it is fit to drink. The body requires water that is 100% pure hydrogen and oxygen, free of toxins and inorganic minerals.

This water comes from two sources namely fresh, organically grown vegetables and fruits and from distilled or purified mechanisms.

Source – SAAEA

Spring shootThe issue of water pollution is becoming more and more serious – it is starting to poison the vegetables we eat. This, in turn, can poison you. So, even if you don’t care about ‘going green’, it makes sense to start growing at least some of your own vegetables.

The problem, according to water expert and Professor at the University of the Free State’s Centre for Enviromental Management, Anthony Turton, lies with the pollution entering our rivers and dams from dysfunctional sewage treatment plants and informal settlements.

It is Professor Turton’s opinion that 60%+ of the water in South Africa’s dams is no longer suitable for human consumption or irrigation. ‘Water eutrophication’ (resulting in blue/green algae) is creating toxins that are already killing some of the animals that drink such water. In humans, these toxins could enter plants and then into those who have consumed contaminated food.

According to Professor Turton, the Government appeared to be hostile to those scientists who talk about ‘water eutrophication’ and has closed down its eutrophication project.

Grow more of your own veg, using properly treated water or rain water – it will be good for the planet, and good for you and your family.

Source (in part): article by Angelique Serrao in The Mercury.

tree inside water drop Using rainwater tanks is the perfect way for you to create the garden of your dreams and keep it green all year round. One of the biggest drains of a city’s water supply can come from people using their water for gardening. Most people enjoy the look of beautiful lawns and lush gardens, however this is using precious water that is needed for bathing, cooking or drinking. Gardens account for most of the water used in the home and is therefore the biggest domestic contributer to the water shortage. No matter what type of water problems you are experiencing and whether you stay in Western/Eastern Cape, Gauteng, Natal or anywhere else in the world for that matter, there is a way to have lush gardens without using up your city’s water supply.

To build a system that is suitable for your garden, you need to calculate a) how much water you need and b) how much water you get. Local rainfall tables are available from Weather SA. By using slimline tanks you can keep your tanks out of the way so they don’t take up valuable space in your garden. If you can’t afford a big tank, use a modulate tank so you can start with one and join on another one next year. Slimline tanks are typically round or elliptical, and some tanks are rectangular and flat, so that fit together and look like a normal wall or fence.

Using rainwater for your garden is also a great idea because you don’t have to do anything to the water before you use it for your plants and vegatables. In fact, some research shows the water even healthier than watering them out of your own water supply, depending on where your local water comes from. Water from the tap is treated with chemicals to make sure there is no harmful bacteria, strange colours or smells. Pipes that deliver the mains water can be over 50 years old and full of rust, dirt, tree roots and other nasty pollutants. Compare that to rainwater which falls directly from the sky!

Getting the water from the tank(s) to your garden, you have a few options to consider. This can be as simple as a watering can or hose for small blocks, although this might result in some serious back injuries after a while! Or an integrated set up with pumps and controllers which is better for larger gardens. If you are concerned with small particles gettingf caught in the sprinklers or you also intend on using the water in your home, then you might consider installing the Water Rhapsody Rain Runners onto your downpipes which sieves out any dirt or particals larger than 1mm. Spiders, Mosquitoes, frogs and other creepy crawlies love water tanks so make sure all openings are covered or closed tightly.

Rainwater tanks will make big difference to your garden and water use and will cost you a lot less than you think. Rain is free so we might as well use it! So call us for delivering or installing your rainwater tanks.  In the Western Cape we are about to enter the time of the year when heavy rainshowers are to be expected. Be prepared and get water tanks now!

© 2013 The Water and Solar Company Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha