Apr 21, 2011
Reuters – South Africa’s cabinet placed a moratorium on Thursday on oil and gas exploration licenses in the semi-arid Karoo region, where the controversial shale extraction technique of “fracking” might be deployed.

The Karoo is a vast and ecologically sensitive region that is high on the radar screen of conservationists.

“Cabinet has endorsed the decision by the department of minerals to invoke a moratorium on licenses in the Karoo, where fracking is proposed,” the government said in a statement.

Petrochemical group Sasol (SOLJ.J), Anglo American (AAL.L) and Falcon Oil and Gas (FO.V) are among those eyeing shale gas in the region. Royal Dutch Shell (RDSa.L) is leading the pack with exploration rights to 90,000 sq km (34,750 sq miles).

“We have noted the South African cabinet’s endorsement of the decision of the department of minerals, and we will seek clarity from the department on the full implications,” a Shell spokesperson told Reuters.

Karoo farmers and conservationists are concerned about the possible impact of hydraulic fracturing or “fracking,” in which drillers blast millions of liters of water, sand and chemicals at high pressure into underground rock to create cracks for gas and oil to escape.

“The department made a decision a while back, and cabinet has endorsed the decision,” cabinet spokesperson Jimmy Manyi said.

He told Reuters the department of minerals and resources (DMR) would lead a task team to explore the implications of fracking, which would include the departments of trade and industry as well as science and technology.

“The multi-departmental task team is going to make sure that all angles are covered in terms of government getting proper information about the implication of fracking,” he said.

Manyi did not give a timeline for when the research would be concluded but said the moratorium would remain in place until “there is conclusive evidence that there will be no unintended consequences on the environment.”

Applications already submitted will have to wait.

“There will be nothing that will be approved until the research is carried out, concluded and pronounced on,” Manyi said.

The Karoo region, home to rare species such as the mountain zebra and riverine rabbit, may hold vast deposits of natural gas in shale rock deep underground.

Once unobtainable, such reserves can now be exploited with fracking and could serve as a badly needed energy source for Africa’s largest economy, which relies heavily on coal.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also currently studying the impacts of fracking on drinking water. Initial results are scheduled for release in 2012.

SOURCE: Reuters (Ruona Agbroko)

(Editing by Ed Stoddard and Jane Baird)

So far we have received an amazing response to our petition to stop hydraulic fracturing in the Karoo, with over 400 signatures collected so far.

Here is a sample of comments from people that have signed the petition and are clearly outraged at the idea of risking our environment in this irresponsible way.

Please see the letter from Treasure the Karoo Action Group to find out more ways in which you can prevent hydraulic fracturing from happening in the Karoo.

Stop Fracking!!! [Michelle]
Fracking has been condemned internationally. This destructive process must not be allowed in the Karoo or anywhere. [Alistair]
We dont want fracking anywhere near the Karoo! [Tina]
How can i get involved to help prevent this from happening. When i heard about it, it made me sick to my stomach. [Jade]
Poisoning the ground to a depth of of 5 km for hundreds/thousands of years with deadly toxins and carcinogens in return for a decade or two of gas strikes me as unbelievably [Sharym]
I saw the devistation caused by fracking in the USA and as a regular traveller to Grahamstown and the Karoo and in support of the farmers in that area, I will gladly sign the anti-fracking petition. Leonie Ackerman [Leonie]
Dear Sir/MadamPlease stop destroying our mother nature.The Earth has been loaned to us.Use it ..Please dont abuse it!!!! [Wineshen]
Fraking is bad news,need to put your foot down.Ban Fracking Damn it! [Leigh]
We are to remember that the Karoo is part of our “common future”. [Helen]
Please note that I object very strongly against the miss-use of very precious water and the disturbance of the frailecology of the Karoo!!!! [David]
NO FRACKING WAY! [Debbie]
This proposed process is not justified and will do far more harm than good. We are more interested in preserving our heritage than supplying an unsustainable source of gas (that is only expoected to last for +/- 20yrs) and the damage they are looking to cause is not at all justified. [Koketso]
Have we not done enough damage to our country. A fine example is the Garden Route. All our forests been cut down etc [Deneen]
When are the governments of the world going to realise that the answer is finding sustainable, clean resources – not ripping the planet apart even more to keep on sucking out the very toxins that got us in to this mess in the first place. Climate change is here people, take your heads out of the sand. [Natalie]
please STOP these activities as it damages the natural life immensely . [Geetanand]
PAREM DE DESTRUIR!!!!FAÇAM ALGO QUE MELHORE AS CONDIÇÕES DESTE POVO SOFRIDO,PENSEM AO MENOS UMA VEZ NO PROXÍMO ANTES QUE SEJA TARDE,ANTES QUE A NATUREZA MATE A TODOS NÓS. [Mariza]
Hydro-fracturing should be banned worldwide…it creates dead-zones and creates enormous amounts of toxic waste dumping. [Cindy]
Please do not frack in South Africa. I have seen the results of this practice. My request is to not do this – ever. [Debra]
For how long can so called intelligent people continue to do dumb things? [Charmaine]
Fracking is a bad idea for humans and the earths crust…which has caused numerous mini earthquakes in the States. (Do some research!) It is a warning not to mess with nature. How many people to must die and become ill for the profit of a few? Shame on you!! [Svetlana]
Please stop the plans to threaten the sensitive Karoo region from being destroyed by Fracking in search of natural gas [Ayelen]
In a region where water is so scarce, this is just not a viable option. The Karoo landscape will be damaged beyond repair…as well as poisoned with the chemicals. Stop this now, you are supposed to be the guardians of our country!!!!! [Carrie]
Please stop the “fracking” in this beautiful natural Land. You are not only going to be depriving future Generations of Mankind, but future Generations of ALL Species that live in the Region…and for what? Who is going to protect the Wildlife and THEIR Natural Habitat? Where is the Wildlife supposed to go? The Human Race has already encroached so much of their space already on this small Earth of ours.I implore you to NOT start or go forward with the fracking in this beautiful land.Thank you. [Tammi]
Stop destroying our world ! [Sheila]
Have we not done enough damage to our environment! Greed is killing what little we have left! LEAVE THE KAROO ALONE!!!! [Carey]
I feel Africa is my second home, please do not ruin your beautiful, natural country/continent by doing this distructive process. [Dianne]
Stop this abomination ! The Karoo is one of our last unique biodiverse areas left. Its beauty and uniqueness has to be protected from this atrocity ! [Dyanne]
Shocking, please leave the Karoo alone!!! [Elize]
Put a stop to this ! The destruction of our beautiful Karoo is unthinkable.!! [James]
For me this is obviously about saving our heritage but its also DEFINITELY about saving the Karoo. Natural gas will run out in the years to come but the Karoo will NEVER recover from such a devastating disaster!!! Sign the petition NOW…. [Nadine]
I AM TOTALLY AGAINST ANY FORM OF MINING IN THE KAROO. WE MUST FIGHT TO SAVE OUR HERITAGE AND MOST IMPORTANT, OUR WATER. [Else]
Earth is our home. Take care of it! Love it! Preserve it naturally! It has got everything it needs by its own! [Hefziba]
This extraction process has destroyed ground water in every location where it has been used. The Karoo does not have the water necessary for the process and cant survive the permanent damage of its scarce water resources. The costs far outweigh the benefits gained from the small amount of gas that can be extracted… [Cynthia]
Protect or natural heritage !!!!!! [Garry]
I find the whole concept of Fracking deplorable and should be apposed at every turn. It should never be allowed anywhere and is in no way sustainable or respectful of mother earth. [Kevin]
Outrageous practice! Im amazed and incredibly angry that its so commonplace, does so much damage to people, animals and the environment – and yet were kept completely in the dark about it and get no say!?!? Spend the money and energy researching clean energy options!! Stop raping our planet!!! [Helena]
I live in one of the most beautiful parts of the world neighbouring the karoo. Fracking is a term generally used by all(afrikaaners and the english) and refers to somethng that is dying. I think this term speaks for itself. [Marcelle]
stop fracking about with this planet! [Judith]
Leave our heritage unspoilt and do not allow fracking to take place at all. [Robin]
Our Earth is fragile. Handle with care! [Sung-Yee]
Disgusting that they are even CONSIDERING doing this to the Karoo! [Gordon]
This is a definite NO GO ZONE. Do not allow this to happen under any circumstances whatsoever!!! [Bob]
The chemicals used in this process are toxic and can contaminate underground water supplies. [Stefanie]
Good Luck to all in this battle which will only be won with money and an excellent environmental legal team, to delay and frustrate their fracking efforts over the comming years.Guy Thesen, Knysna. [Guy]
I own property in Aberdeen in the Karoo and I am strongly opposed to destruction of the sensitive environment due to fracking or any other dubious method. [Susan]
Let us all get together and stop this MADNESS before it starts [Joan]
Dont let any one mess with the Karoo [Ashleigh]
Leave the Karoo alone!!!!!! [Vicki]
Man’s greed will be his downfall. Leave this precious peace of earth alone, Shell!! [Barbara]
Stop this madness!!! [Tertius]
We really need to find more ecological and therefore sustainable ways of feeding our energy needs, or our home planet will be a very poor and barren place indeed in the future. [Natalie]
Dont thing the benefits will outweigh the costs. [Gauteng]
Karoo is not for reaping profit. Its for the world to enjoy and to aspire too. [Ian]
Why does everything have to be destroyed in the name of progress and wealth? Leave this unspoilt territory alone please [Patti]
Please think of the wildlife ! [Michelle]
Check this out… http [Brendan]
Leave the Karoo as unique and untouched as it is! [Christa]
Once again we are looking at the economic benefits and not paying attention to the ultimate outcome to the environment which in the long run will outway the benefits to the people of the area. Will this be another asbestos problem which will only raise its head in many years to come when the population of the areas get sick ! [Cleona]
S T O P [Patrecia]
The Karoo is the last place in SA where there is no pollution of any kind [Helen]
This is absolutely horrific – in this day and age nobody should even consider a deeply disturbing procedure anymore – it will end up in an earth quake or vulcano eruption or any other form of earth complaint – mother eartn is sick and tired of humans behaving in such a crude and inconsiderate way, what a hole lot of bullshit. Fracture geological structures [Christine]
Stop the fricking fracking! [Arne]
NO..!! Absolutely Not..! This is totally unacceptable,inappropriate and completely unnecessary! WE HAVE TO STOP THIS IMMEDIATELY – PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN – this is nothing but unadulterated RAPE or our beautiful Earth. [Frances]
Dont allow the fracking to happen. STOP IT NOW……. [Julia]
Stop ruining our beautiful country [Yvette]
Keep the Karroo as it is. Use other green ways of energy!!…solar etc. [Deon]
I am signing the petition to stop Shell and other parties from proceeding with this investigation. [Belinda]
Please lets stop the distruction of our planet and leave somthing for our children and their children to inherit..have you stiped to consider the impact on the fragile ecosystem of the Karoo ? Or do you just not care..its just about feathering your own nests ! [Caro]
This is going to destroy the Karoo. [Ned]
The solution for the future is not fossil fuels. Just like BP had no control in the Gulf, Shell have no complete control in the Karoo. A disaster can happen and then its all gone and the shareholders/directors live happily ever after on their yachts in the Med!!! [Carl]
Dont gamble with the Karoo. Go frack in your own backyard. [Siegfried]
My wifes family (Kroon) is an old Graaff Reinet (farming)family and we are apalled that the licensing authorities are even considering approving a project whose water requirements would have a devastating long-term effect on part of out valuable natural heritage. [Nick]
Fracking can destroy the Karoo in several different ways. If we dont at least try to stop this, it will be the legacy that our generation will be remembered for. [Abe]
The Karoo cannot become another victim of the stupid greed of our era. we are leaving an appalling legacy to our children! [Sally]
I agree with the attached e-mail totally. [Daleen]
The Karoo is part of our natural heritage and should be there for our childrens children to discover! It should be preserved for future generations! [Susan]
We need to leave our natural beauty natural and STOP destroying it!! [Nicola]
Must the big conglomerates ruin absolutely everything in the world!!!! [Adele]
please do not spoil our land anymore. [Linda]
Groundwater is more precious than natural gas. Keep greedy oil companies away from the Karoo! [Megan]
Please show some careing for the future [Jill]
No franking!!!!!!! [Rachelle]
Other peoples greed should not be allowed to destroy our enviroment. [Roy]
Experiment somewhere else! And use less power – that way we all save. [Shayne]
Invest the money for the exploration into renewable energy. Informed people know that the Karoo is a very sensitive balance ecosystem maintained by very dedicated people over hundreds of years. People who care for every single Karoo bush, simply because it is irreplaceable. [Kobus]
Fracking in our country must NOT BE ALLOWED!! [Diana]
No fracking! We have done enough to bugger up our beautiful country.. [Kim]
This would totally ruin one of the natural areas of our country and would cause irreprabale harm that couldnt be undone. [Katey]
They just cant do this to the Karoo! The charm of the Karoo is the fact that its unspoiled. Aside from that, its time we started listening to the earths cries. Where will the ruination of our planet end? When there is nothing left to ruin? Stop the Fracking! [Corrianne]
Stop the fracking [Caroline]
DO NOT ALLOW IT! [Esme]
Stop the fracking! [Len]
Please get Shell out of our country – with those South Africans involved, hoping to make s fortune if the fracking is allowed to go ahead. Put them aboard a plane to the Bermuda Triangle… [Joe]
Major oil companies such as Shell must be prevented from destroying the planet for monetary gain. They need to use their millions and invest in research and development to find environmentally friendly alternatives to fuel. [Riana]
Please dont wreck the Karoo, dont let it go the same way as the Qwagga its a fragile, wild and beautiful ecosystem. The damage may not be apparent immediately but our children will suffer the consequences and loss. Greed is no excuse or a synonym for progress. [Jurgis]
Please dont destroy our land! [Dirk]
God has blessed this world with such amazing and divine nature.. its so sad that certain humans always seem to have the need to destroy it!! STOP HURTING NATURE!!!!Salaam alaykoem from Halyma, a moroccan lady living in Belgium, in love with her homeland, wether its morocco or south-Africa, Congo, Iraq, etc…. [Halyma]
100% against the proposed Fracking in the Karoo…. Preserve our country and its beauty against these capitalists giants that think our country is a free for all! It is because we allow it to be! STOP the FRACKING fracking!! [Jj]
Please do not do this to the Karoo. [Linda]
The earth is our only home. Ignorance is not bliss! [Natasha]
save our planet [Helen]
Surely weve got enough renewable resources e.g. wind and sun without resorting to this destruction of our natural heritage. [Shirley]
This must never ever be allowed to happen.The consequences are just horrendous.We are basically raping the enviroment without the thought of the future. [Charles]
NO fracking in our beautiful Karoo! [Alison]
Ban fracking in the Karoo!!! [Chris]
Protect SAs emotional and spiritual heartland. [Mieke]
We cant allow this to be done to our beautiful Karoo region. [Chad]
STOP FRACKING – MY WELL WATER IS CLEAN RIGHT NOW AND I WANT TO KEEP IT THAT WAY! [Stephanie]
Every person who cares, please do something however small, each little effort will eventually build a giant mountain to stop Shell turning Karoo into Gasland. If each of us consumes less of the resources needed to sustain high-tech lifestyles, we will also lessen the demand for new sources of energy, esp unrenewable energy. [Rosalie]
I am currently living in The Netherlands, but know the Karoo and have several friends living in those parts, who would be affected by this proposed Fracking project. It will be a tragedy if this project goes through… [Charlotte]
Stop the madness! [Ali]
Big fuel companies are all mother frackers [Tess]
How does the saying go????? It takes generations to build something which can be destroyed in a few seconds (for a few bucks) [Jane]
It is hard to believe that there has to even be a debate about Shell coming to the Karoo. It is so obvious that it would be the most ridiculous environmental blunder….Surely it is plain to see. Leave the Karoo alone we do not want Shell here. Lets move forward with solar energy and keep our water clean. [Cindy]
No fracking in South Africa. Ban fracking and get the greedy energy/oil companies out of the Karoo. [Sarita]
STOP THIS PLEASE! [Tamlyn]
Find out the truth about the consequences. Let the Executives come to live in the aftermath they will create. Taking profits out of our country for themselves and leaving behind them a wastland and contaminated ground water. They are just like dictators who start a war but dont fight themselves. Oil companies cant rely on oil anymore but they need to find ways to increase profits. We dont need the gas. Go back to where you came from, you are NOT welcome HERE. [Ivan]
I say NO to allowing SHELL to explore the Karoo. [Duncan]
This cannot be allowed to go on. We live in a Beautiful country which is being changed for the worst…. All the scenic areas being taken up by quatter camps or other money making projects for the government. Lets keep our land free. [Peter]
Open Letter to Minister of Minerals Resources I refer to the application for Shale Gas exploration by Shell through Fracking in the Karoo. I am a citizen of South Africa, who has on one or two occasions travelled through the Karoo on holiday. In my daily life as a citizen of Johannesburg I’ve heard of tourist opportunities and the beauty of the Karoo. In addition, there are inland and overseas exports of Karoo meat products as well as wool and mohair. This is to name but a few infinite economic benefits of the Karoo to the people of South Africa. I am thus compelled to appeal to the Minerals Department, through its minister to, under no circumstances grant the Shale gas exploration rights in the Karoo to Shell. While Shell has gone to great lengths to assure the people of South Africa, the Karoo, and the Ministry of Minerals that Fracking for purposes of shale gas exploration is safe and the chances of leakage of dangerous gases and pollution of the already limited water sources is minimal, I feel duty bound to remind the authorities of wisdom to learn from history. In the not so distant past (April 2010), technical malfunction lead to an oil spillage in the Gulf of Mexico in the United states of America. This, in spite of the fact that British Petroleum (BP) had assured the country and its residents that all precautions have been taken and the chances of any disaster occurring are minimal. Recently in Japan (March 2011 to date) there is an ongoing nuclear crisis in Fukushima, this as a result of a natural disaster, a tsunami following an earth quake. Again, this has occurred in spite of the company involved assuring citizens that all precautions have been taken and the chances of any disaster occurring are minimal. In both cases local resident’s lives and employees’s lives have been threatened with illnesses beyond our comprehension, and previously infinite livelihood opportunities in the agriculture and fishing industries have been lost. Why then would the ministry of Minerals resources even consider granting rights for fracking in the Karoo, when there are chances, although defined as minimal, for a disaster to occur? Why would we as South Africans take the chance to want to learn from our own mistake when there are mistakes by other nationalities that we can learn from? One scientist, interviewed by CNN on the Fukushima nuclear crisis said [Nthabiseng]
The Karoo will bring sustainable tourism dollars in forever. Oil and gas will come and go with a job growth and job loss bubble. Clearly there is only one long term choice. Please dont sell the Karoo for short term profit and short term job growth. [Paul]
Does the hunger of wealth always precede the heritage left to the people of a country like Africa. The Karoo is such a heritage, distinguished by its vast tracks of indigenous bush and mountains. Small herds of game are still visible and merino sheep are raised on this ideal bush. Fracking will destroy this area which will become and unusable tract of country.Read the book “The Camdeboo Plains” which describes the beauty of the Karoo where the fracking is due to take place and realise the beauty thereof. Leave the Karoo alone. [Gail]
NO to Fracking [Christa]
Fracking is still not a well researched method of extracting petrochemicals from the earth. I liken it to performing heart surgery with a roughly sharpened garden spade. Lets do this on the moon guys not in a fragile, unique environment like the Karoo!!!!! [Roaland]
Please save our earth by signing this petition. We need soil not oil; we need hydration not degradation. [Gail]
No no no to fracking in the Karoo [David]
i am totaly against the fracking system and request that this be banned. [Kate]
We do not agree with ANY hydraulic fracturing in the Karoo. [Lynne]
Stop the fracking for gas in our beautiful Karoo. They may benefit for a few years until the gas runs out but the environmental damage will be long term. [Michael]
Surely intelligent people know the dangers of chemicals by now [Gay]
What part of “NO” do they not understand? [Opperman]
It is because of unknowns at the time that we today sit with the negative legacy of mining practices of the past. Do we want to follow the same route and leave an unknown an possible negative legacy for our children and theirs? NO! [André]
DO NOT try and do to us what you did to the Americans!! We will not tolerate you! [Riaan]
I cannot believe that anyone would believe the promises or guarantees of a greedy corporation like Shell. They will destroy the Karoo, and use money to pay off the people who get hurt, but it wont restore what we already have. Save the Karoo and send Shell packing!! [Meegan]
Fracking destroyed large parts of America, dont let it destroy the Karoo. Fracking will polute the undergroud water and destroy the natural habitat and a lot of farmers will no longer be able to farm and that will have a effect on the production of wool and mohair (as mohair is produced mainly in the Karoo) and this will have a effect on the economy and job losses. [Lizemari]
Stop the fracking now!!! [Senovia]
Stop the fracking. There are many alternatives to petrol driven vehicles. [Gillian]
stop wrecking the beautiful countryside, why dont you try and improve solar energy etc? [Patricia]
STOP THIS NOW!!!!! [Sue]
No to fracking in Karoo [Henry]
Do not Frack in the Karoo [Bruce]
I am totally against Fracking in the Karoo [Linda]
Go away! [Albertus]
Do not frack around in the karoo, keep your greed in check. [N.]
stop being silly! just use other systems of energy that are available without harming the earth… [Kim]
I support the banning of fracking in the Karoo (and anywhere else). [Zena]
Save the Karoo. It is so beautiful, not to be distroyed. [Joyce]
Risk seems too great [Ted]
I support totally all drives to stop any form of fracking in the Karoo. Stop Shell or any other organisation immediately. [Dee]
No to fracking in the Karoo [Brent]
This will be the begining of the END OF THE BEAUTIFUL KAROO.The KAROO should be saved for ALL and not so a few greedy people can prosper whom no doubt DONT LIVE IN SOUTH AFRICA.They must be stopped at all costs. [Andrew]
we say NO NO NO, go to hell Shell…!! [Toni]
I fear that political expediency will trump environmental caution and that all efforts to stop this lunacy will be drowned in burocratic procedures. [Ssan]
As a french scientits I am 100% backing your action against fracking in the Karoo. Please note that french petrol companies are also trying to do the same in France!!!. Below, you will read an invitation that I received for a seminar organized by Total. They will try to demonstrate to the scientific community here that fracking is not dangerous!!! Of course they will not suceed….Dr. Jean-Luc MELICE (Institut de Recherche pour Le Developpement, Paris, France) ************************************ Jeudi 7 avril de 13 à 14h, séminaire commun Sisyphe/IsteP [Jean-Luc]
save the karoo [Mchael]
HOW MUCH MORE DO WE WANT TO DESTROY OUR PLANET?AS HUMAN BEINGS WE SHOULD BE LOOKING AFTER THE WONDROUS GIFT, THE PLANET.I GUESS IN THE END WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY FOR OUR GREED. UNFORTUNATELY MANY INNOCENT LIFES WILL BE LOST. [Colette]
No to any explotation of pristine areas. [Telmo]
Please stop this, think of all the damage !!!!! [Ria]
I am against any mining of this type in the Karoo, STOP SHELL [Kathy]
Leave our land alone, its not ours, its our childrens and our grandchildrens, we are just the caretakers, so leave our Karoo alone so that we can care for it, for our future dependants, as without that land they dont have a future. [Mary]
shell stop fracking in the karoo [Isabel]
Let us preserve our earth for our childrens children! [Hannah]
In support of anti-fracking [Sandy]
Protect the Karoo, potect our South Africa against exploitation!! [Anton]
Ban fracking [Sarah]
Save our country from all the ways to destroy it. [Frikkie]
No consideration for the beauty of the Karoo. Stop them [Kobus]
Please prevent this disaster from taking place in the Karoo – my heartland. [Danie]
Find a greener solution to meet our energy needs, why do we need to destroy the ecosystem, this is unacceptable [Samantha]
The Karoo is a sensitive biodiversity hotspot. Foreign companies have too much influence, and are allowed to do what they like. Much of South Africa has been ruined already because foreign companies, with no cultural investment here, come to do what they are not allowed to do at home. [Joan]
I am opposed to fracking!! [Joanne]
We cant allow this to happen – for our children and their childrens sake. [Alma]
No to fracking.Boycott all Shell garages & products. [Joan]
This is a time in world affairs when we should be actively seeking and promoting clean (and free) sources of energy such as solar, wind, geothermal and zero-point to name a few. I, along with many others, consider the practice of fracking to be nothing short of CRIMINAL. STOP FRACKING NOW!!! [Graham]

Finding new ways to tackle the growing challenge of accessing clean drinking water has become a priority for most countries around the world, including South Africa. With recent statistics indicating that more people are dying annually from unsafe water than from all forms of violence combined, including war, there has never been a greater global need.

In South Africa, an estimated 5.7 million people lack access to basic water services, and about 17 to 18 million people lack basic sanitation services. Impacting mainly the marginalised poor, these figures are likely to increase due to industrial expansion, rising population and climate change – which is set to drastically affect sub-Saharan Africa.

One of the approaches being explored in many countries, including South Africa, to tackle the challenge of providing clean water, is nanotechnology. Nanotechnology is the manipulation of materials at a very tiny scale – essentially at the atomic and molecular levels. At the nanoscale, the normal rules of physics and chemistry often do not apply, and as a result many materials start to display unique, and sometimes surprising properties.

New models for treating wastewater

The properties offered by nanomaterials make them well suited for treating water, and provide an opportunity to refine and optimise current techniques. This technology can also provide new and novel methods for treating domestic, industrial and mining wastewater.

Essentially, nanotechnology can offer a tailor-made solution to remove a particular contaminant, or a solution that “multi-tasks” – using different nano-based techniques. This is ideal for water purification, because water contains different forms of contaminants at different locations, such as heavy metals (e.g. mercury, arsenic), biological toxins including waterborne disease-causing pathogens (e.g. cholera, typhoid), as well as organic and inorganic solutes.

Although nano-scale materials have always existed, the concept of nanotechnology was first documented in 1959 at a talk given by physicist Richard Feynman at an American Physical Society meeting. Almost twenty years later the term “nanotechnology” was defined in a scientific paper by Norio Taniguchi at Tokyo Science University.

Microscopes make nanoscale visible

It remained largely theoretical until the early 1980s when the scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) was developed and a few years later the atomic force microscope (AFM). This equipment made it possible for nanoscale materials to be seen, characterised, manipulated and even manufactured.

In South Africa nanotechnology has been embedded in national strategy and policy since the publication of the White Paper on Science and Technology in 1996. The National Nanotechnology Strategy (NNS) was launched in 2006.

Nano research at institutions

Water is one of six focus areas highlighted in the NNS, where nanotechnology can offer the most significant benefits for South Africa. This is reflected in the high volume and quality of research at various institutions around the country.

To date, through the Department of Science and Technology (DST), the government has invested over R170 million in different aspects of nanotechnology research and development (R&D).

Two nanotechnology innovation centres have been commissioned and have formed collaborative partnerships with industry, universities and bodies such as the Water Research Commission (WRC) to conduct cutting-edge research. Much of this has focused on water purification, and as a result, a range of water treatment devices that incorporate nanotechnology are already commercially available around the country.

Using capillary ultrafiltration in the Western Cape

A locally produced membrane and filter system for potable and industrial water is already commercially available in South Africa. The aim of the project between the University of Stellenbosch and the Water Research Commission (WRC) was to produce suitable cost-effective systems to replace expensive imported equivalents.

With a pore size of 35 nanometres in diameter, the capillary ultrafiltration (CUF) technology enables the removal of bacteria and viruses, colour, metal oxides, namely iron, manganese and aluminium. It is also suitable for pre-treatment of seawater and the treatment of industrial water and wastewater.

Ikusasa Water was granted the licence by the patent holders (WRC) to produce the CUF membranes and membrane systems in a factory in Somerset West in the Western Cape in late 2009.

Now available to the South African water sector, the CUF provides water treatment solutions for rural areas, especially for those municipalities seeking to provide new water services or improve their Blue Drop scoring.

Cleaning brackish water in Madibogo village, North West Province

A partnership between the University of the North West and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) has developed a treatment plant in the rural village of Madibogo in North West Province. The plant incorporates ultrafiltration membranes to clean brackish groundwater as the majority of the inhabitants depend on groundwater or borehole water for their water needs.

Several types of membranes were tested in this pilot study, including reverse osmosis membranes and ultrafiltration membranes, to see which would most successfully remove the polluting solutes while retaining the essential nutrients.

This pilot study has demonstrated the importance of available supporting infrastructure (e.g. electricity) and the need to involve the local community to ensure the up-take and sustainability of the technology.

Tea Bag water filter from Stellenbosch

Dubbed the “tea bag” filter, this is a water filter small enough to fit into the neck of a bottle which may provide a very cheap solution to purify water in remote areas or where there is no regular water supply of potable standard. It could also potentially be used worldwide by relief organisations where clean water supplies are threatened by water-borne diseases such as cholera as a result of natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods.

The “tea bag” filter sachets are made from the same material as Rooibos tea bags, but contain activated carbon instead of tea. The inside surface of the tea bag material is coated with a thin film of biocides encapsulated within tiny nanofibres.

This makes it unique amongst available water filters, since the filter traps the bacteria, which are then killed by the biocide coating. The tea bag is placed in the neck of a bottle and when the water passes through the filter, all disease-causing microbes are killed, making the water safe for drinking.

This low-cost technology, developed by a team at the University of Stellenbosch in the Western Cape headed by Prof. Eugene Cloete, could well provide a novel, effective point-of-use technology with a huge potential impact globally.

Once used, the tea bag filter is replaced, preventing the problems associated with clogged filters leading to ineffective use. Since the nanofibre is also a solid structure rather than a nanoparticle, the filter biodegrades and so there is no risk of unintended impacts on human health or the environment.

The tea bag filter will be tested soon by the South African Bureau of Standards, after which the project team hopes to roll it out to various communities.

Uses of nanotechnology in water treatment

The applications of nanotechnology being investigated and applied in the water sector include:

  • Nanofiltration membranes – These act as a physical barrier and selectively reject substances smaller than their pores and so remove harmful pollutants and retain useful nutrients present in water. Nanotechnology enables the membrane pore size to be made smaller and more uniform, and have increased reactivity. For example, the pilot study in Madibogo village uses reverse osmosis membranes to treat brackish groundwater to produce potable water.
  • Nanocatalysts and magnetic nanoparticles – These are nanoparticles with catalytic properties that can chemically break down pollutants right where they are, avoiding the need to transport them elsewhere. Many new applications are looking at photocatalysts that use light to break down pollutants. Magnetic nanoparticles bind with chemicals due to their large surface area, and can be easily recovered with a magnet.
  • Sensing and detection – Small, portable sensors are also being developed with enhanced capabilities for detecting biological and chemical contaminants at very low concentrations in the environment, including in water.

Benefits include specificity and ‘smart filters’

Nanotechnology offers a number of benefits to the water sector, for instance, by enabling more effective removal of contaminants at lower concentrations due to increased specificity and “smart filters” tailored for specific uses. Novel reactions at the nanoscale due to increased numbers of surface atoms may also enable the removal of contaminants that were previously very difficult to treat.

The number of treatment steps, the quantity of materials, as well as the cost and energy required to purify water could be radically reduced using nanotechnology – making it easier to implement in remote rural communities. It will also impact on the way water is purified around the country once the initial investment has been made by the water industry in developing the new infrastructure required. Before this time, improvements to existing materials such as membranes can be made through nanotechnology.

Nanotechnology, which is right at the cutting edge of discovery, offers a variety of new career opportunities for today’s young scientists. Due to the cross-cutting nature of nanotechnology, there is a multitude of possible careers to pursue and an array of new opportunities for up-and-coming youngsters. Specialised post-graduate courses are likely to be developed in the next five to ten years to meet the increasing need for expertise in the nanotechnology field.

Unintended effects on humans & environment are risky

In addition to being used to improve water technology, nanotechnology is being applied by other economic sectors such as health, consumer products, industrial applications, etc., and to date more than 1 100 nanotechnology-based products are already available to consumers worldwide.

However, there may be unintended effects on human health and the environment as it is likely that a percentage of the nanoparticles used in these products may eventually interact with humans and the environment at different stages of the products’ lifecycles.

There are concerns that the same properties (size, shape, reactivity, etc.) that make nanoparticles so useful could also make them harmful to the environment and toxic to humans, for example, if they enter and build up in drinking water supplies and the food chain.

Consequences are unknown

These concerns are exacerbated by the current poor understanding of the fate and behaviour of nanoparticles in humans and the environment. For example, silver nanoparticles used in socks to reduce foot odour are released during washing, and the titanium dioxide particles used in paints are released from the exterior of building walls into the drainage systems.

Based on the scientific findings published to date in this field, these nanoparticles are likely to interact and destroy beneficial bacteria which play an important role in wastewater treatment plants.

Risk assessment research is crucial for establishing the potential impacts of nanoparticles upon human health and the environment: the technology’s benefits must be balanced against any unintended consequences. This is a massive challenge, since it is very difficult to monitor the possible impact of the huge volume of diverse nanoparticles being produced and used in different products and applications.

Research to investigate safety and ethics

Although there are currently no nanotechnology-specific regulations in South Africa due to the relative infancy of this emerging technology, the government, through the DST, is funding a research platform to investigate the environmental, safety and health aspects of nanotechnology. This will include an inventory of nanoparticles in production or use in South Africa, as well as focused research and development of the required infrastructure and human capital.

An ethics committee is also being established by government, made up of diverse stakeholder representatives to ensure that the technology adheres to ethical principles. To date around the world (in Canada, the US, Japan and the European Union), relatively “loose” regulations have been developed mainly based on inconclusive evidence and scientific data that demonstrate the impact on humans and the environment of products already in use. It is likely that these regulations will be modified and tightened accordingly as new data become available.

It is important that nanotechnology be developed in a safe, responsible, acceptable and sustainable manner. As risk assessment becomes an integral part of nanotechnology research in South Africa, the risks may be avoided based on the lessons learned from other technologies in the past, such as asbestos, DDT, etc., which were later withdrawn from use.

Substantial initial investment

Although substantial initial investment would be required to incorporate or switch to nanotechnology-based water treatment methods, once adopted, maintenance costs would be considerably lower over the long term and a higher-quality water product would be provided, particularly to rural communities.

It is vital that the water sector becomes familiar with this technology as it is set to change how water is cleaned, and clearly stands to offer significant advantages for a country such as South Africa.

This story was submitted by SAASTA (South African Agency for Science and Technology Advancement) from the Department of Science and Technology.

Source: Green Times
Author : Helen Malherbe

Western Cape Province State of Dams on 2011-02-14

Dam Levels 2011 02 14

# Means latest available data
FSC is full storage capacity in million cubic meters

Dam River FSC This Week Last Week Last Year
Berg River dam Berg River 127.1 77.3 80.2 95.8
Brandvlei Dam Lower Brandvlei River 284.3 52.9 54.8 61.9
Buffeljags Dam Buffeljags River 4.6 100 100.6 44.3
Bulshoek Dam Olifants River 4.9 83.8 87.6 77
Calitzdorp Dam Nels River 4.9 56.6 55.5 32.9
Clanwilliam Dam Olifants River 121.8 54.7 58.9 62.8
Duiwenhoks Dam Duiwenhoks River 6.2 99.1 99.8 24.5
Eikenhof Dam Palmiet River 28.9 67.1 70.2 63.4
Elandskloof Dam Elands River 11 40.8 44.5 57.9
Ernest Robertson Dam Groot Brak R 0.5 100.3 100.5 80.1
Floriskraal Dam Buffels River 50.3 23.7 10.1 64.5
Gamka Dam Gamka River 1.9 0 0 0
Gamkapoort Dam Gamka River 36.3 103.5 106.6 38.4
Garden Route Dam Swart River 10 100 100 26.5
Haarlem Dam Groot River 4.7 100.5 101.1 24.9
Hartebeestkuil Dam Hartenbos River 7.2 23.8 24.1 50.2
Kammanassie Dam Kammanassie River 34.4 6.8 6.8 12
Keerom Dam Nuy River 9.8 66.2 67.6 82.7
Klipberg Dam Konings River 2 33.2 34.7 69.7
Korentepoort Dam Korinte River 8.1 81.1 82.9 28.6
Kwaggaskloof Dam Doorn River 173.9 50.5 52.3 59.1
Lakenvallei Dam Sanddrifskloof River 10.3 86.2 86.8 94.8
Leeugamka Dam Leeu River 14.1 68 53.5 2.6
Miertjieskraal Dam Brand River 1.6 0 0.2 0
Misverstand Dam Berg River 6.5 102.3 101.9 101.7
Oukloof Dam Cordiers River 4.2 8.4 6.4 60.4
Pietersfontein Dam Pietersfontein River 2 65 65.5 87.4
Poortjieskloof Dam Groot River 9.8 44.5 44.4 69.7
Prinsrivier Dam Prins River 2.3 19.7 10.8 32.6
Roode Els Berg Dam Sanddrifskloof River 7.8 25.7 30.1 56.2
Steenbras Dam-Lower Steenbras River 33.9 43.5 41.5 63.4
Steenbras Dam-Upper Steenbras River 31.9 91.9 96.6 66.7
Stettynskloof Dam Holsloot River 14.8 66.1 70.8 64.2
Stompdrift Dam Olifants River 49.6 15.9 11.8 11.7
Theewaterskloof Dam Riviersonderend 480.2 66 68 80.1
Voelvlei Dam Voelvlei River 158.6 75.1 77.6 76.5
Wemmershoek Dam Wemmers River 58.8 81.3 83.1 69.5
Wolwedans Dam Groot Brak River 25.3 73.6 74.2 32.4

stop fracking the karoo

No vision in Karoo fracking plans
What is it going to take to stop the plans to threaten our sensitive Karoo region from being destroyed by Shell’s plans to blow it apart in search of natural gas?
A controversial application by oil giant Shell to explore for gas in an area of the Karoo should be put on hold, the Democratic Alliance said on Tuesday. The opposition party warned that exploration would involve processes that risked contaminating surrounding bodies of water, but Shell countered that processes were in place to prevent this happening.
In a letter to the Minister of Environmental Affairs and Water, Ms Edna Molewa, Mr Gareth Morgan questioned whether the minister “has the ability to assess the efficacy or appropriateness of these activities at this stage.”
Clearly, it is incumbent that all who know or care about the future of Karoo life should participate as much as possible to ensure that responsible decisions are taken at high level.
He emphasised the serious threat to the rare water resources of this region, due to
• the large quantities of water needed for this fracking process, as “each fracking event uses at least 15 million litres of water and each well can be “fracked” several times”… I am not sure how many wells Shell would drill if granted the exploration right, but it could be hundreds as they could explore for up to nine years” and
• the threat of ground water contamination. “There is then an attempt to fracture the rock using a high pressure flow of liquid, including water, sand and so-called ‘special-purpose’ chemicals.”
• “The Environmental Protection Agency in the USA has begun a two year study on the possible relationship between hydraulic fracturing and drinking water following concerns reflected by the US Congress about the process in its 2010 budget report. If a country like the USA, with immensely more technical capacity than our own country, is concerned about “fracking” then we should be too. Added to that there is a moratorium on “fracking” in New York State and apparently over 160 municipalities in the USA have banned “fracking” through local by-laws.”
In a letter we’ve received from Dr. David Gaynor, manager of the Sneeuberg Nature Reserve in the Graaff-Reinet, he also looks at the threats to livelihoods and the desertification of the Karoo:
Short-sighted profits rule
“Fracking for gas is not appropriate development for the Karoo. The exploitation of natural gas through hydraulic fracturing threatens the Karoo’s most valuable resource – clean, uncontaminated water. The granting of exploration permits to Shell and other companies to search for gas in the Karoo will pitch the short-term profits of mining a fossil fuel against the risk of permanently contaminating the scarce water resources of the Karoo.
The gas, a mixture of methane and other gases might be cleaner burning than oil or coal in terms of some pollutants, but produces the same amount of carbon dioxide meaning that it will be a significant contributor to global warming. Each commercial well will probably only produce for 10 -15 years and create very few local jobs. Most of the profits will go into the multinationals pockets and any long-term problems will be left to the inhabitants of the Karoo to live with.
10 million litres of water each time
Initial exploratory drilling will require up to 10 million litres of water, with around the same amount being needed for each hydraulic fracturing of the underground rock. Not only does this water have to be sourced, but it is then mixed with a toxic cocktail of chemicals to aid the drilling and fracturing process.
Most of this contaminated water will be pumped to the surface and will have to be safely stored and treated. Significant amounts of this polluted water will remain underground and could potentially infiltrate underground water sources.
Underground water is the life blood of the Karoo. It is scarce, but if utilized wisely it underpins all sustainable development in the Karoo. It supports the cattle, sheep, wildlife, lucerne and other pasture Lands – the main economic activities in the Karoo. It supplies clean water to the towns and growing townships, whose existence is dependent on clean water and the income from livestock farming, hunting and tourism.
Livelihoods threatened
Are the risks of permanently contaminating the one thing essential for life and livelihoods in the Karoo – Water – worth the short-term and limited local benefits of mining a fuel that will only contribute to global warming?
The best regional models for global warming indicate that with continued use of fossil fuels the proposed area of mining will by 2040 experience conditions so hot and dry as to be only comparable with the Namib desert. It would be ironic if this degradation was fuelled by the exploitation of gas reserves in the very same area, especially when this area has so much potential for the development of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power.
The government has promulgated feed in tariffs that ensure that companies like Shell can invest, assist development and make money from renewables rather than relying on the old carbon economy to make money for their shareholders.
There is currently a public participation process, as Shell needs to consult with all interested in affected people and compile an Environmental Management Plan, before they could be awarded this right.”

A well written article from the Green Times

Journalist Heather Dugmore is up in arms about Shell’s bid to start hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) over 30000 square kilometres in the Karoo in the hunt for natural gas reserves. Here’s her article “Will Shell Frack up the Karoo?” which ran widely in the press this week:

Farmers, communities, environmental organisations, geologists and water specialists are up in arms about global energy and petrochemical company Shell’s application to explore for shale gas over 30 000 square kilometres in the water-stressed Karoo.

The proposed exploration method, called hydraulic fracturing or ‘fracking’ involves drilling boreholes 4-5 kilometres deep, followed by the introduction of a mixture of chemicals, sand and millions of litres of water into the boreholes under enormous pressure to fracture the geological structures and force the free-flow of shale gas, also called ‘natural gas’.

This process determines whether viable amounts of shale gas exist for future exploitation based on the same method.

“Fracking has been described as ‘planting chemical bombs underground’ says Environmental Consultant and farmer, Fritz Bekker who is spearheading an opposition group of farmers and non-government organisations against another application by a company called Advasol (Pty) Limited to explore for gas from Struisbaai to Mossel Bay, extending 20 kilometres down the southern Cape coast.

“With an approved exploration right, an applicant such as Shell may drill as many exploration boreholes as it can afford, which may be hundreds or even thousands depending on the area’s geology. Each borehole may be subjected to the fracking process,” continues Bekker.

“It is important to note that the most significant adverse environmental impacts of earth gas exploration may already occur during the exploration phase.

“Fracking has been condemned in many countries in the world and despite assurances from companies using this method that they will prevent any leakages, I need to warn farmers, landowners and communities in the Karoo that it poses a significant threat of chemical and gas contamination to the region’s scarce water sources. Both the surface and ground water is highly vulnerable to contamination once pressurized shale gas is liberated through the drilling and fracking process.

“The long-term effects of toxic chemicals used in the fracking process are only now becoming apparent in countries where it has been used. The chemicals used during fracking in America have been positively linked to cancer, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, diabetes, asthma, learning disorders and endocrine disrupting effects.”

“If they drill they will also need large quantities of water and storage space for vast volumes of flammable, potentially toxic drilling mud in dams close to each drilling site.”

Shell’s background document states that they are investigating a number of potential water sources to support the water-intensive fracking process, including “sea water, surface water and deep saline aquifers”. What they fail to say is that millions upon millions of litres of water are required for the process, which the Karoo does not have, and that as Bekker says: “It takes one litre of hydrocarbons such as shale gas to pollute one million litres of water.

Shell has appointed Golder Associates (Golder) to compile the Environmental Management Plan and to undertake the public consultation process. Shell’s application to explore for shale gas has been submitted to the Petroleum Agency South Africa (PASA), which administers applications as a designated agent of the Minister of Energy. Golder’s background information document states: “PASA is expected to make a decision during 2011 whether to award the initial three year exploration rights.”

Brent Baxter, Business Unit Leader, Environmental Services at Golder explains that “once a company lodges an application for an exploration right under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act they have 120 days to submit an Environmental Management Programme (EMP) in support of the exploration rights application. This is a legislated timeframe. Shell thus needs to submit an EMP, in support of each of the three exploration rights applications that they have lodged in the Karoo, by 18 April 2011.”

To compile the research required for the EMP, the background document says: “a number of technical studies will be undertaken as part of the EMP process. Desktop studies will cover the larger application area and some fieldwork will be undertaken in selected areas to support the findings of the desktop studies.”

The mention of “some fieldwork” is alarming. “The EMP by its nature must include specialist studies by geologists, ecologists, as well as specialist groundwater and surface water studies. Without these studies they cannot responsibly comment on the potential impact of gas exploration or mining required in the EMP,” Fritz Bekker explains. The applicant will not be able to budget for the management or mitigation of adverse environmental impacts that they have not identified properly during this phase of the application.

Specialist environmental surveys such as botanical, hydrological and ground water investigations should be planned to take cognizance of seasonal variance, which is now not possible because of Shell’s haste to obtain approval.

Baxter responds that “fieldwork to inform the EMP will be conducted by specialists between mid January and early February 2011 after which the draft EMP will be compiled. This fieldwork will of necessity be broad-based seeking to characterise the broad environment within which the proposed project takes place and seeking to verify information available in public datasets, such as national groundwater database information.”

This means they are giving themselves two to three weeks of fieldwork to inform an EMP of this magnitude. Baxter says the period cannot be extended because of the 18 April deadline to submit to PASA.

It begs the question whether an environmental management plan can ethically be presented without an indepth assessment of the potential impact on the environment.

Baxter reassures that an Environmental Impact Assessment will be conducted “for any activities which are listed under the NEMA, before exploration activities commence”.

One would expect so, but it still does not address the potential fracture in the EMP process. Asked why Golder and Shell did not rather apply for the period granted for the submission of the EMP to be extended, Baxter said this was not possible.

The first of several meetings to be hosted by Shell and Golder is to take place in the Karoo town of Hofmeyr on Monday 24.

Many farmers, communities and interested and affected organisations have not been informed about the meetings, nor about the application. Those who are aware of it are trying to spread the word as widely as possible, which is what Golder should be doing. However many interested and affected parties attend, it promises to be a heated exchange.

Asked how they had advertised the meetings, Golder’s Public Participation Officer, Toni Pietersen, replied that they placed adverts in national and community newspapers. She said that it is unfortunate that they were placed approximately one week before the meetings were scheduled to begin; explaining that the Christmas period had hampered the timing. She adds that they had sent emails and posted the background documents to as many landowners, communities, farmers and affected organisations as they could locate.

Their distribution process appears to be lacking since not even the President of Agri Eastern Cape, Ernest Pringle, who farms in the affected area, received contact or background information from them. Neither did the Chair of the Rooihoogte Farmer’s Association in the Middelburg district, Ed Kingwill, nor did the Regional Chief Director for the Department of Water Affairs in the Eastern Cape, nor the Nama Karoo Foundation, the conservation agency working to protect and preserve the natural and cultural heritage of the Karoo, based in Richmond and Graaff-Reinet in the Karoo.

All received the information by chance via associates.

“I have seen a documentary on frack mining and after I watched it I thought thank god I will never have to deal with this in the Karoo. So I thought until I received word about Shell’s application two days ago,” says the Nama Karoo Foundation’s Marina Beal.

“Water, much of which is ancient water dating back millions of years, is the most precious commodity in the Karoo. This is a semi-desert area and it is a well-known fact how scarce water is in the Karoo, many parts of which are only now emerging from one of the worst droughts in decades. The potential for contamination of water through fracking is significant and potentially environmentally devastating.”

Geohydrologist, Ahee Coetsee, who farms in the Middelburg district comments:

“My initial reaction is that we all have to be extremely careful because despite assurances from mining companies that they follow ethical and green environmental procedures, we only need to look at the coal fields and acid mine drainage to know that while we might have excellent environmental laws, the enforcement of them and technical know-how is lacking.

“We simply do not understand enough about the aquifer systems in the Karoo, which is why various studies are being done, such as by the Water Research Commission to look at the dolerite ring aquifer systems of the Karoo, from the surface to a depth of 3-500 metres.

“There are many and varied aquifer systems in the Karoo, some dating back 300 million years and older. If Shell is planning to drill down to 4 kilometres and more, and if the boreholes constructed are not 100%, there can be cross contamination between aquifer systems.

“If they do not comprehensively research and understand the hydro-geology of the exploration area, then they will need to be investigated from a technical and legal point of view.”

Professor Bruce Rubidge, Director of the Bernard Price Institute for Palaentological Research at Wits University elaborates that when Shell talks about drilling down 4-5 kilometres in the Karoo, they are talking about accessing the Ecca group of rocks dated at approximately 270-million years: a time when the Karoo was an ancient marine environment.

The Karoo is globally renowned for its fantastic wealth of fossil material, and Rubidge, who is a son of the Karoo, says “I care greatly for the Karoo and I would hate to see a big petroleum industry set up there. It would destroy the character of the Karoo.”

Shell justifies the application in its background document by referring to shale gas as “the cleanest of the fossil fuels” and stating that: “South Africa is faced with the challenge of being able to meet future energy demands of an expanding economy. Developing a natural gas energy supply to help meet this growing demand would be of considerable value to South Africa.”

What they fail to state is that the carbon footprint becomes outsize if they start calculating the process of extraction of shale gas through hydraulic fracturing, the process of accessing water from an as yet unidentified source, including possibly transporting in sea water, transporting the gas to market and the potential environmental degradation in this pristine part of the world.

As Africa’s highest emitter of carbon, the government has committed to transform to a low carbon economy with a focus on renewable energy programmes, notably solar and wind. The Karoo is high on sun for solar power plants but extremely low on water.

running tap

Future water shortages are a growing concern for business, according to a global survey published today.

The research shows that more than half of the 147 firms responding expect problems with water in the next 1-5 years.

It says 60% of firms have already set performance targets on the way they use water.

The report predicts that the issue will get much worse as the world demand for water is projected to soar over the next few decades.

The UK’s chief scientist John Beddington has warned that water scarcity will form part of a perfect storm of environmental problems.

And today’s report from consultants ERM was requested by institutional investors who want to know how much risk their investments face from water problems.

It shows that 39% of the firms are already suffering from water related issues – including disruption from drought or flooding, declining water quality, and increases in water prices.

Sectors reporting the greatest exposure to water risks include food, drinks & tobacco and metals & mining.

Firms are increasingly recognising the risk to their brand if they are seen to be wasteful with water in countries where it is in short supply.

The growing demand for companies to measure their performance mirrors the existing trend for firms to measure their output of greenhouse gases. The ERM report says if firms measure their use of a commodity they tend to draw up policies over the use of that commodity.

But it says water differs from carbon in the sense that there are often alternatives to fossil fuels but there are no alternatives to water.

The challenge lies in managing what we have among competing users, whether they are firms, communities or natural systems.

The research was organised by the Carbon Disclosure Project, which does research on behalf of 137 institutional investors representing US$16 trillion of holdings.

Jacqueline McGlade, director of the European Environment Agency, welcomed the disclosure initiative. “Climate change is altering global water availability, meaning greater scarcity in some regions and more flooding in others. We must adapt our infrastructure and our consumption,” she said.

Source – By Roger Harrabin Environment Analyst, BBC News

The necessity of saving water is still in our faces, just as we thought it might be the beginning of the end with the resent rains we had. But just the opposite is becoming a reality. At Water Rhapsody, we want to urge the public to start another thinking mode than what they were used to. Not just during or because of restrictions, but as a general way of thinking. Let us not be so narrow minded, that the availability of water are  no concern to us at this stage of our lives, and we think we will be gone by the time it really becomes a problem. 

We have a system called the Poseidon Advantage, where the grey water from car washes are going through a cleaning process, and re-using the same used, but clean water to wash the cars again. Car washes are being targeted to invest in systems to conserve water, for their demand of washes might increase significantly during these droughts.

Have a look at this article in the Port Elizabeth Express by Monique Vermeulen on the 3rd of Nov:

Despite much need rain over the last three weeks, the region’s water crisis continue to worsen with supply dams rapidly drying up.

If it does not rain significantly in the next few weeks, residents and businesses will face even more severe water restrictions to be introduces by the Department of Water Affairs, which will inevitably have a negative effect on the economy. At a recent Infrastructure and Engineering Committee meeting, it was said that further water restrictions, with a devastating impact on industry, will be unavoidable unless dam levels rose significantly. “We expect the Department of Water Affairs and other role players, which includes the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality, to consider the curtailment of water resources when the combined dam level capacity reaches 30%. This could happen in three to four weeks if we do not get more rain,” said Municipal Media Management Officer, Kupido Baron.  When asked what these restrictions would entail, Baron said that he was not at liberty to predict what the outcome of the operational meeting would be.

The average level of the dams currently stands at just over 31%, and the current predictions by the Municipality suggest that the Metro will run out of water July 2011. The current water situation is painting a bleak picture for car washes.

In an open letter to car washes, the Municipality requested the urgent implementation of water-saving measures. The letter states that more people are making use of car washes to conserve their own home usage and to comply with the rules for domestic consumption. “This has served only to divert the usage from one consumer to another. The result of this has seen an expansion of many car washes with little or no usage control. Therefore, all car washes are urgently requested to take measures that will save water and/or harness rain water, so as to reduce consumption of this precious commodity. It is recommended that car washes erect water tanks to collect rain water. The letter furthermore states that car washes should keep water usage statistics as the Municipality intends to acknowledge car washes that proactively save water as part of their operations

In May this year, the Municipality applied for R1.6 billion in drought relief from the Eastern Cape Provincial and National Government, but to date has not heard from them. According to a daily newspaper, the application is still with the Department of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs, which is waiting for additional information from the Eastern Cape government on how it spent received disaster funds.

First on the list of emergency measured is the construction of a desalination plant at Swartkops at a cost of R750 million. Additional emergency measures include the fast tracking of the Nooitgedaght-low-level scheme (R650 million), accessing the low-level storage (8000 ml) in the Impofu Dam (R5 Million), the sinking of Boreholes (R100 million), the repair of water leaks at schools (R50 Million), and the detection of water loss (R20 Million).

Please take your time to scroll through the whole of this website: have a look at our systems of Rainwater Harvesting (Grand Opus), Grey water Re-use (Garden Rhapsody and Second Movement), the saving/recycling  of Backwash water (Poolside tank), saving on the amount of water used to flush toilets with (the Multi Flush)

Contact us to give you a no-obligation quote to save this much needed natural resource!

Seen in the magazine, SA Men, Werner Neuhoff takes role of SA Man of the Week with the following article attached

As the world confronts the growing scarcity of the most indispensable resource, fresh water, a global body of female thought leaders will convene in Canada in October to explore and better understand what’s at stake.

South African “ecopreneur”, Werner Neuhoff, from Water Rhapsody; will present to the International Women’s Forum (IWF), comprising leaders from 70 nations in Montréal, Québec. The global leadership conference will draw women heads of state, corporations and enterprise, as well as members of the diplomatic community, women policy-makers, decision-takers and opinion-leaders on five continents.

According to Neuhoff, global leaders have recognised the importance of addressing future threats to water shortage. The conference will highlight the importance of water for everyday life and ensuring its availability in years to come. “I’ll be talking about the current water situation in South Africa, the importance of water conservation and provide long-term sustainable solutions like rainwater harvesting from roofs and grey-water re-use,” says Neuhoff.

Unfortunately South Africa’s water sources are not in a better situation that the rest or the world. It is estimated that fresh water demand in South Africa will outstrip supply by 2025. The more frightening indications are that Gauteng will have water outages by 2016 and Cape Town will have serious water shortages by 2013. As early as 1995, Professor Bryan Davies, then-head of the Fresh Water research unit at UCT, predicted that Cape Town would be dry by 2013.

“We have always been able to augment further supply by building an additional dam, but not so anymore. There is not another single place or any more river water that can possibly be found anywhere in the Western Cape for augmenting supply. The Western Cape is simply damned out of water,” Neuhoff explains.

An anticipated 800 – 1000 leading experts, advocates and catalysts for change will take part in this global dialogue that will focus on Water, Wealth & Power for the Eco-Century. Their global membership will be challenged to test the boundaries of possibility for a new era of improved access to and utilisation of water resources. Neuhoff will be presenting to this global audience for the Plenary Program – Ecopreneurs: The Blue Gold Rush.

“It’s a huge privilege for me to know that I’m representing ecopreneurs and South Africa at such a prestigious event. It’s certainly one of the highlights in my career and I sincerely hope that our solutions will be implemented, not only in the world, but most importantly here in South Africa,” Neuhoff says.

The conference is designed to stimulate new thinking on domestic and foreign policies regarding water. “As South Africa, we represent the African continent. The water industry will become far greater than any other industry, including gold, minerals or oil,” Neuhoff explains.

The IWF is a global organization of pre-eminent women of significant and diverse achievement. It is a one-of-a-kind organisation of singular standing in the world today that furthers dynamic leadership, leverages global access, and maximises opportunities for women to exert their influence.

“If South Africa’s decision makers do not react to the solutions that we’ll be delivering to the world leaders, we could very well find ourselves in a situation that will be impossible to recover from. The time to save water is when there is water to save. Once the water has run out, it will be too late,” Neuhoff concludes

© 2013 The Water and Solar Company Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha